首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of eddy covariance and modified Bowen ratio methods for measuring gas fluxes and implications for measuring fluxes of persistent organic pollutants
【2h】

Comparison of eddy covariance and modified Bowen ratio methods for measuring gas fluxes and implications for measuring fluxes of persistent organic pollutants

机译:用于测量气体通量的涡动协方差和改进的Bowen比率方法的比较以及测量持久性有机污染物通量的含义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Semi-volatile persistent organic pollutants (POPs) cycle between the atmosphere and terrestrial surfaces; however measuring fluxes of POPs between the atmosphere and other media is challenging. Sampling times of hours to days are required to accurately measure trace concentrations of POPs in the atmosphere, which rules out the use of eddy covariance techniques that are used to measure gas fluxes of major air pollutants. An alternative, the modified Bowen ratio (MBR) method, has been used instead. In this study we used data from FLUXNET for CO2 and water vapor (H2O) to compare fluxes measured by eddy covariance to fluxes measured with the MBR method using vertical concentration gradients in air derived from averaged data that simulate the long sampling times typically required to measure POPs. When concentration gradients are strong and fluxes are unidirectional, the MBR method and the eddy covariance method agree within a factor of 3 for CO2, and within a factor of 10 for H2O. To remain within the range of applicability of the MBR method, field studies should be carried out under conditions such that the direction of net flux does not change during the sampling period. If that condition is met, then the performance of the MBR method is neither strongly affected by the length of sample duration nor the use of a fixed value for the transfer coefficient.
机译:半挥发性持久性有机污染物(POPs)在大气和地面之间循环;然而,测量大气与其他介质之间的持久性有机污染物通量是一项挑战。要精确测量大气中痕量持久性有机污染物的浓度,需要几小时到几天的采样时间,这排除了使用涡度协方差技术来测量主要空气污染物的气体通量。替代方法是使用改进的Bowen比率(MBR)方法。在这项研究中,我们使用了来自FLUXNET的CO2和水蒸气(H2O)数据,将通过涡度协方差测量的通量与使用空气中的垂直浓度梯度通过MBR方法测量的通量进行比较,该平均浓度源自模拟平均数据所需的较长采样时间的平均数据持久性有机污染物。当浓度梯度很强且通量是单向的时,MBR方法和涡流协方差方法对于CO2的系数在3的范围内,而对于H2O的系数在10的范围内。为了保持在MBR方法的适用范围内,应在一定条件下进行现场研究,以使净通量方向在采样期间不发生变化。如果满足该条件,则MBR方法的性能既不受采样持续时间长度的影响,也不受传输系数固定值的使用的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号